Following investigations of sexual assault reports at the University of Montana, President Royce Engstrom turned to the University community for help in spreading awareness that sexual assault is a serious crime that has serious consequences. In response, a health and human performance professor, Charles Palmer, tasked his students in his upper-level ethics class with a homework assignment that consisted of proposing a plan for spreading UM’s no-tolerance message. I would like to take up these recommendations, as I read them in Chelsi Moy’s article in the Billings Gazette.
Do not have freshman orientation be the only venue for discussing sexual assault
Not only are freshman inundated with information regarding class schedules, campus policies, dining hall protocol, but they are constantly reminded in the first week of their college career that they are embarking on a critical journey. No pressure, right? On top of that, they’re being informed about drinking, the legal, academic, and health consequences that could stem from drinking underage, and the ways to keep themselves safe on Friday and Saturday nights. Throw in the word rape or sexual assault and their overwhelmed scale skyrockets but they are not retaining any information at this point. Anxiety has officially taken over or they have maintained their “it won’t happen to me, I’m ready for college!” attitude.
With that being said, research shows that there are high rates of sexual assault against freshman women in the first month of college. So it makes sense that this would be the target population on campus to educate about sexual assault. But one meeting where the word rape is voiced and then never talked about again until allegations are brought against a student is not a productive or effective way of preventing sexual assaults on campus.
Students must be aware of and reminded of the sexual assault services on campus or locally available.
Furthermore, giving students a brochure with a hotline phone number to campus or local sexual assault services will only increase the amount of paper in the recycle bin after orientation. Students must be reminded that these services are available, how to access the services, and what it means for a student to access these services. Walking into a rape crisis center on campus, located across from a building with classrooms or next to the health services center is extremely daunting for any victim. Confidentiality must be discussed with the student body. The services that they will be offered, not obligated to have, must be discussed with the student body so they know what will happen when they walk through those doors or call that hotline. If these things are not consistently discussed with the student body, then victims are less likely to come forward to seek the help that they need and deserve.
Two quotes from students stood out to me: “People don’t understand the consequences. They don’t realize this is a serious crime. They just think they can get away with this.” – Ryan Johnson and “We have to hold each other accountable. We have to tell each other that it’s not OK. We cannot be in the silent majority.” – Brian Buckreus
I found these quotes both interesting and worth noting because though they are 100% right, a lot has to happen in order to see consequences and hold perpetrators accountable. All too often we read in the news that allegations have been brought forward on campus and the alleged perpetrator faced no consequences while the victim received humiliation, threats on campus, and no justice. All too often we read about allegations being silenced on a campus community and no actions being taken. All you have to do is skim the blog posts on this very blog. So although Buckreus and Johnson are onto something, the entire campus community, including law enforcement and administration, must also be on board.
The fact that UM is rallying students to enter into a very important dialogue about this pervasive problem occurring not only on their campus but on every campus in the country and beyond is extremely commendable. Students listen to students. If I have learned anything about prevention education in my very short career in anti-sexual violence work, it is that an educator challenging a student on a belief, attitude, or norm is not as effective as his or her own peer challenging him or her on that very belief, attitude, or norm. Furthermore, although campus security/law enforcement, the administration, and other faculty and staff are prominent members of the University community, they do not see everything that occurs nor can they understand the experience of students. Therefore, engaging students in the conversation is both necessary and sufficient. Without their voice, a valuable perspective is lost.