Call for Submissions: Tell It Now

Hey writers and artists, this is making the rounds on web. Check it out:

“Tell It Now” (working title) will be an anthology dedicated to supporting and empowering those who’ve experienced sexual violence, bringing together a range of genres and styles. We recognize sexual violence as a continuum of experiences, from street harassment to completed rape. We’re interested in publishing poetry, fiction, essays, letters and visual art.  We hope to collectively challenge the marginalization of sexual violence as a social problem; to explore the role of sexism in violence; and to validate and examine our varied life experiences. We admire the radical and the unexpected, the controversial and the beautiful. We also like to laugh. Artwork will be reproduced on black and white pages, and as such, it’s best to limit it to line drawings.

Send submissions to by May 1. Send up to five pages of poetry, ten pages of prose, three images of artwork.

Why Guns Won’t Make a Campus SAFER

Because I did not grow up in a culture that valued gun-ownership, it’s EXTREMELY hard for me to wrap my mind around why anyone would think a bill allowing students and professors to carry concealed handguns on college and university campuses would be a good idea. But that is the bill that is set to pass in Texas, and the law that already exists in Utah.

The folks who support this legislation claim that they are supporting students’ rights to defend themselves, and use school shootings as an example. Because, if one disturbed student has a gun and starts killing their peers, it would be great if one of their peers could whip out a handgun and start shooting back? Really, that’s the logic. The presence of one gun necessitates more guns to protect students from the danger of guns. WHAT? Again, I am a person who was not raised to associate weapons with safety, but I really struggle with the idea of a campus in which any of my classmates could be carrying a handgun as a safe campus. Especially considering the hysteria about alcohol on campus…you’re really OK with drunk students being drunk ARMED students?

I exchanged a couple of emails back and forth with a friend about the implications this law might have for campus sexual violence, and while at first I didn’t make the connection (in 2011, only 3% of reported rapes involved the use of a gun), further reflection and conversation connected some dots in a number of really uncomfortable, upsetting, and scary ways.

  • Scenario one: you go back to someone’s room, you’re making out and they start to take things farther than you’re comfortable with. You say no, but they’re really persistent and a get aggressive. And you know they have a gun.
  • Scenario two: you’ve reported a rape and the perpetrator’s friends know about it. They consistently follow you around campus having really loud conversations about how they have been practicing their aim at the firing range in town. You feel threatened and report the behavior, but even if administration finds that the students do indeed have a gun, they are legally allowed to.

As my friend put it, “the perceived threat level increases enormously while the ability to intervene drops dramatically.”

Proponents of guns on campus believe that the threat of violence justifies the presence of guns. By allowing guns on campus, the threat of violence is increased. Again, the flaw in this logic is pretty clear. If you live in Texas, reach out to your representatives and let them know you don’t think guns have a place on college campuses.

Quick Hit: Awesome, Free Organizing Toolkits For All Kinds of Activists

This semester I’m in a class on community organizing and advocacy, which basically means my brain is on SAFER overload—everything I read, my mind immediately flips it to “yes, but how would that play out on a campus? What does that mean for campus policy???” It’s pretty out of control. But it’s an awesome class, and it’s pointed me to a number of great FREE organizing resources that I will share with you as I come across them. For starters, check out these really comprehensive online community organizing/campaign toolkits:

  • The Community Tool Box
  • The Realclout Toolbox from the Public Policy Institute

Though not free, I cannot recommend enough Tools for Radical Democracy, a book written by one of my professors (!) that not only recounts the community organizing strategies used by Community Voices Heard in NYC, but includes a number of really practical exercises and tools for getting your group/campaign off the ground.

Finally of course I need to plug SAFER’s very own free (and hopefully soon to be updated!!!) organizing manual, Change Happens. Happy reading and happy organizing!

Planned Parenthood Saved My Life

The beautiful and moving piece of writing that you’re about to read was originally posted at Abortion Gang a few days ago by Kaitlyn, who also tweets from the handle @MsEdBostonian.

If you haven’t already heard, the House of Representatives recently passed the Pence Amendment, which aims to strip Planned Parenthood entirely of federal funding. Conservative lawmakers are also trying their darndest to eliminate federally-funded family planning broadly by cutting Title X. This unprecedented attack on sexual and reproductive health and rights has elicited a groundswell of support for Planned Parenthood, in particular. I’m perpetually steeped in these issues, and I often worry about the state of mainstream opinion when it comes to reproductive justice. So I’m heartened to see people coming out of the woodwork to protest the war that’s being waged against Planned Parenthood, which, in my mind, is a sort of proxy for reproductive and sexual health and rights, generally.

It’s important to note that SAFER is a reproductive justice organization, which means that we care about the social, political, economic, and cultural factors that intersect with sexual assault and significantly impact young people’s ability to make decisions about their bodies and their lives.

Please take a moment to read Kaitlyn’s incredible essay. I promise that it’s worth your time.

Planned Parenthood Saved My Life

I doubt there is a person in this country who’s life hasn’t been in some way touched by Planned Parenthood and the work they do. Many of them may not even know it; many of the people in my life don’t know it. There are a thousand stories about the work that this organization does and how it changed or save a life. This is mine.

In the summer of 2009, I was preparing to leave for a volunteer trip to Africa. With the intention of quitting my job, packing up my life and leaving the country for months, I fit in one last lady doctor appointment while I was still covered by insurance. I knew everything would be fine. I had been sleeping with one person for years, and I had been tested before and during the time we were together; this was a mere formality.

A month later, home in Boston with my family, I received a polite letter informing me that something was wrong with my pap smear. I needed a follow-up appointment. I had no insurance.

I had already escaped the possibility of cancer years before and quite frankly, I had other things to do with my time. I left for my trip and forgot about the letter. But because I am, despite my frequent best efforts, a responsible adult, I left the letter on my desk so it would be there when I got back. And so, heartsick and strangely homesick for my adopted country, very broke, dirty and exhausted, and physically ill, I returned home to face the very real possibility that something was deeply wrong with my health.

This would be where Planned Parenthood comes in.

At this point, I had been accepted to graduate school. I had always been employed. I had been a volunteer in Africa, I am a non-smoker and a runner, and I help little elderly people cross the street while distributing bunnies to sick children from a hat. I doubt the largely (straight?) white men who run this country could ask for a more responsible citizen (don’t tell them about all the super-queer sex I tend to have, as that might undermine my point). But no one would see me. Many doctors offices wouldn’t take me without insurance, even if I could afford to pay out of pocket which, given the thousands of dollars they wanted for each of multiple appointments to even tell me if something was wrong, I couldn’t. I did not want to wait what might be several crucial months longer to get insurance through my school. I had never used PP before – mostly because I had simply never needed to – but I called them now.

Among their questions was, “Do you have insurance?” It was not the first question; it was merely a way of determining not IF I could pay, or IF I could see someone, but HOW I would eventually pay, AFTER I had seen someone. And then they very simply, directly, told me what my appointment was likely to cost, and answered my questions about the cost of possible follow-up. They were the only office to deal realistically with the fact that my life, like so many others they saw, was in transition. And then I went in to see the doctor.

A few weeks later I knew it was bad; worse than I had let myself imagine, and they used the word “cancer”, although they also used the word “pre”. I didn’t want to alarm my family and friends so I made the arrangements, drove myself to the clinic, asked my questions and prepared for several unpleasant procedures to fix this tiny little question of cancer which just might be a tiny little question of whether I lived or died and if I lived, whether I could ever have children. I went, and then I went back, and then I went back again.

And every time I went, people screamed at me and called me terrible names, or gently told me about hell, or quietly handed me disgusting, terrible pictures.

On several of, by any stretch of the imagination, the absolute worst days of my life, people took the opportunity to say horrible, disrespectful things, things they would never otherwise believe they had the right to say, with no idea of why I was at my doctor’s office. I come from a comfy liberal sort of city; there were never many of them. But I thought of the hundreds of people a week who walked through that door for any reason, and I wondered how employees at the clinic got up every day and never snapped on these people, never told them what they really thought. I know I don’t have that strength, because at the end of my second visit, when a woman called out to me, some poor little soccer mom in sneakers, I turned on her. I told her about cancer and my terror that my young body was about to become a nuclear war zone. I told her about how it felt to know I would have to walk past her and the people like her, and how I hated her not for myself, but for all the desperate women who had come there for the reason she seemed to assume we all had. I thought about how bad they had made me feel for needing to fight cancer, and how much worse they must make women feel who were making one of the hardest decisions they’d would ever make in their lives.

After that day I began politely informing the protesters that I was there to have an abortion. I still do, every time I go. Because someone there may be, and I don’t think their needs are any less justified than mine. You’d think some of them would recognize me by now; you’d think just one of them would have figured out that I probably couldn’t be managing more than one abortion a week. But I think it’s possible they have never, ever bothered to actually look at me.

Without Planned Parenthood, I might have waited too long to have the appointments I needed to have. I might have had far more serious complications than the relatively minor procedures I underwent. And the people who love me may never think about it this way, but Planned Parenthood may have saved them from the loss of me. That is a worthwhile social investment, I think, and I will fight to keep it.

I stand by Planned Parenthood.

Nice to Meet You! And Some News Out of Pennsylvania

Hello, readers! Before I launch into some of this week’s sexual assault-related news, I want to take a moment to introduce myself. My name is Megan and I’m one of SAFER’s new Co-Communications Coordinators, along with Selena, whose biographical blurb you can also find here. I’m currently a Master of Public Health candidate at Columbia University studying Sociomedical Sciences with a concentration in Sexuality and Health. Besides thinking about sexual and reproductive health and rights, I spend my time cuddling with two unusually friendly Chihuahuas named Stewart and Elinor. I’m very excited to be here, and I’m hoping to help all of you keep abreast of what’s happening re sexual assault with some related news on the side. So stay tuned!

Now that that’s out of the way, I’d like to draw your attention to a recent piece in the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review about the implementation of House Bill101 at colleges and universities across Pennsylvania. According to Rachel Weaver, this bill, “passed in November, requires schools, among other things, to establish a program that includes information on drug- and alcohol-fueled sexual violence; medical treatment and evidence collection; the possibility of pregnancy; and sexually transmitted diseases.”

I really, really love primary prevention, so this struck me as an exciting development for Pennsylvania. The bill even calls for “a discussion of consent, including an explanation that the victim is not at fault,” although Weaver doesn’t explicitly list consent as a component of the newly-mandated programming. If you ask me, consent represents the singular most important, potentially transformative sexual assault-prevention concept around. All too often, society blames college victims by chalking it up to bad decision-making and a few too many drinks. I’m not saying that binge drinking doesn’t increase one’s likelihood of being raped by another person. But if attitudes toward sex, gender, and sexuality weren’t so utterly messed up, we wouldn’t live in a society where 1 in 5 college women experience sexual assault or attempted sexual assault before graduation.

I have one all-too-familiar gripe with HB 101. Inductive reasoning leads me to believe that this bill only requires sexual assault prevention programming for recently matriculated students. Specifically, it stipulates that:

An institution of higher education and private licensed school shall conduct a follow-up program for the duration of the school year for new students (emphasis mine). The program may consist of the following:

(1)   Lectures relating to sexual violence prevention and awareness.

(2)   Institutional activities relating to sexual violence prevention and awareness.

(3)   Videos and other educational materials relating to sexual violence prevention and awareness.

It’s really awesome that HB 101 requires colleges and universities to go beyond the “talk-about-it-at-orientation-and-forget-about-it” model of sexual assault “prevention.” But what about continuing students? There’s no way in hell that one course and a few outside-the-classroom learning activities reverse a lifetime of rape-culture indoctrination. So why aren’t these sorts of lectures and videos encouraged in students’ second, third, and fourth years of college, too?

It’s easy to be an armchair critic when it comes to sexual violence prevention on U.S. campuses, and there’s no doubt in my mind that HB 101 is a step in the right direction for Pennsylvania. But there’s always, always room for improvement.

Awesome Student Activists of the Week: George Washington Students Against Sexual Assault

I’m behind on this, but Amanda Hess has been on top of the excellent awareness campaign students at George Washington University ran last week. The 3000 Campaign is a direct response to a survey which found that “a majority of GW students are uninformed about how to report or seek help following a sexual assault. About 74 percent of those surveyed said they don’t feel GW educates students about available resources for sexual assault victims…” 3000 reflects the number of students at GWU who will be sexually assaulted in their lifetime judging by the 1 in 3 lifetime statistic from RAINN.

Students started by postering the campus, and then tabled in a number of dorms, distributing information about the sexual assault resources that exist on campus and calling for more school-sponsored education and resource awareness. But like many student activists are now doing, GW SASA have taken their work online and are using a number of social networking sites to continue the dialogue and create new student-centered spaces. The GW SASA website is now up, and includes everything from a resource list to meeting minutes (yay for transparency!). The twitter page is in full swing, as well as the campaign’s facebook page, which includes a “For Help” tab to share resources.

A new strategy though, is their use of formspring to allow students to share anonymous  stories about sexual violence. The responses are heartbreaking, but seeing them together reminds you of the power of giving voice to these experiences and the absolute necessity of the work the GW SASA (and similar students around the country) are doing.

Violence & Passion: Not Synonymous

With Valentine’s Day almost upon us, I want to highlight this action by Hollaback! D.C. (If you don’t already know about the expanding anti-street harassment Hollaback! movement, check it out.) Hollaback! D.C. is calligng attention to a Valentine-themed gimmick called “Crimes of Passion” meant to boost attendance at the National Museum of Crime & Punishment. The promotion is mostly a guided tour for couples, but as a bonus, visitors will also get to view

special exhibit boards placed throughout explaining various crimes of passion, many of which took place in the D.C. metropolitan area.

It’s not really clear what these exhibit boards will showcase, but most of us already know what the term “crime of passion” often describes: violence (including  murder) perpetrated by a victim’s current or former romantic partner. As Hollaback! D.C. points out, the museum’s cute and coy advertising copy is making light of something that isn’t.

I know that museums, like most knowledge and cultural institutions these days, are struggling with reduced budgets and pressure to be more accessible and relevant. I’m sure that the National Museum of Crime & Punishment needs to get more visitors in the door, and holiday-themed specials are a good way to do that. And to its credit, after Hollaback! D.C’s efforts received some local coverage, the museum made a statement addressing it and claiming that it would have “information” about intimate partner violence available during the event. On the event’s promotional page, they’ve provided the number for the National Domestic Violence Hotline and links to local and national anti-violence organizations. Which is all well and good, but ends up seeming like a bit of a mixed message at best (and lip service at worst). I’m sure it’s true that museum staff believe that “domestic violence is not a crime of passion but a pervasive social illness” — but  that statement doesn’t negate the fact that promoting an exhibit that capitalizes on the perceived link between violence and love (i.e., “passion”) directly undermines that message. As Hollaback! D.C. explains, the key features of these kinds of crimes are power and control, not passion or romance.

Look, this museum didn’t invent the practice of romanticizing intimate partner violence. The term “crime of passion” isn’t new, and these ideas are still very much with us (see, for example, the Eminem/Rihanna hit “Love the Way You Lie,” which Ashley discussed on this blog last year). This marketing gimmick isn’t the core problem — the fact that “crime of passion” is still very much a part of our lexicon is. But capitalizing on this perverse misunderstanding of violence helps contribute to what the museum itself calls “a pervasive social illness.” It’d be nice if they’d rethink this issue more deeply and go beyond pairing the promotion with a boilerplate advisory about domestic violence. Tomorrow is the event’s last day, but this is the second year they’ve promoted “Crimes of Passion,” so it’s definitely still worth speaking up about. Consider signing Hollaback! D.C.’s petition or contacting the museum directly.

In Case You Were Wondering Who We Are…

Monday night was our first Board meeting with our four fabulous new Board members, which reminded me that I should take a moment to call-out who the faces behind SAFER actually are these days. You can check out our bios to get a sense of who is doing all of this work.

Recently I was talking with a student who was surprised to find that I am 25 (and probably also that I arrived to meet her looking like a messy grad student). I suppose sometimes I forget that to the rest of the world, who we are at SAFER isn’t totally transparent. But I think it’s worth mentioning time and again, that not only are we an organization run by volunteers, we’re a pretty young organization. Most of us are in our early/mid-20s, a bunch of us are currently in school or thinking of returning, and few of us came to SAFER with professional managerial experience. That doesn’t make us better than any other org or more cool or anything else, but it does make us unique and sometimes I think I forget that! So three cheers for (slowly aging…)young feminist activism, and doing this whole nonprofit thing a little non-traditionally. I’m totally fascinated by stories from other young/nontraditional orgs. If you are involved in one, you should talk to us.

Critic’s Pick: Definitions of Consent

If you missed last week’s post on Drug and Alcohol Amnesty Policies, one of our goals here at SAFER is to use the Campus Accountability Project to gather the best and worst practices of campus sexual assault policies. This week, we’re investigating Definitions of Consent.

As far as policies go right now, nearly every school has a different definition of sexual assault. Most agree, however, that sexual assault occurs when there is an incident of “non-consensual” sexual conduct. Unfortunately, many schools stop there. Students are somehow supposed to know what non-consensual sexual conduct is when the word consent isn’t defined anywhere! Definitions of consent are integral to sexual assault policies because they are the key to determining when sexual assault or misconduct has occurred.

A surprising number of universities’ policies never define consent. Some attempt to briefly discuss what consent is not but can’t seem to make it to what consent actually is. A concrete, clear, and well-defined definition of consent allows students to assess their own behavior and lends support to survivors who choose to file reports and take action.

Let’s start by looking at what some regard as the classic example: Antioch College. The Sexual Offense Prevention Policy aims to foster positive, consensual sexuality that emphasizes respect and ongoing communication. Directly following the preface, the policy states:

Consent is defined as the act of willingly and verbally agreeing to engage in specific sexual conduct.

A number of clarifying points follow this definition, stating, among other things, that “consent is required each and every time there is sexual activity,” that the person initiating is responsible for getting consent, that silence is not consent, and that all parties must have “unimpaired judgment.” The nearly 15 clarifying points are extremely important in making this definition of consent concrete and understandable.

Reed College also offers a good example of a definition. It divides its definition into two parts: effective consent and ineffective consent. The policy makes clear that unless consent is clear and effective, it cannot be considered consent. The great thing about Reed’s definition is how it gets across the message that victim blaming is not accepted. Take a look at some of what it says about effective consent:

Effective consent is informed; freely and actively given; mutually understandable words or actions; which indicate a willingness to do the same thing, at the same time, in the same way, with each other…Students are strongly encouraged to talk with each other before engaging in sexual behavior, and to communicate as clearly and verbally as possible with each other…it is the responsibility of the initiator, or the person who wants to engage in the specific sexual activity to make sure that he or she has consent. Consent to some form of sexual activity does not necessarily imply consent to other forms of sexual activity…Mutually understandable consent is almost always an objective standard…

Reed begins with what consent is in detail and then encourages communication in a sex-positive manner, while acknowledging that not all situations are identical. This definition also provides an exception (the only exception!): long-term relationships. The ineffective consent portion recognizes that there are many scenarios in which a person is unable to consent while putting the responsibility on the initiators of the act. It emphasizes that victims cannot be blamed for what they experience. All in all, Reed’s definition of consent is detailed and comprehensive while providing numerous examples to reinforce clarity.

Let’s give a few more shout-outs to schools with better-than-average definitions of consent: Case Western Reserve University, Emory University, Duke University, and Hamilton College. While these definitions may not necessarily be quite as comprehensive as the two discussed above, they give a pretty clear idea of what the schools define consent to be.

There is a long list of schools, including Cornell University, College of William & Mary and Bethany College, that do not say what consent is but manage to define what consent is not. While this is not ideal, at least these schools are one step ahead of those who do not even come close to clearly defining consent. Boston University, Brown University, and Haverford College all fall under this entirely unfortunate category. Sadly, this last list of schools is by far the longest.

It’s about time that campus policies included a clear and detailed definition of consent. It is not enough to say that the college or university does not tolerate “non-consensual” sexual conduct. There is no way for students to truly understand what that means and evaluate their own and others’ behaviors unless consent is defined. How can students be expected to only engage in consensual acts if they don’t know what those are?

One highly controversial aspect of policies that I didn’t address today in the consent definitions is the statement about “mentally incapacitated” or “mentally disabled” persons. Tune in next time to get a rundown of which schools are doing it well and which ones can’t quite get it right.

And remember: consent is sexy!

Quick Hit: Intersectionality Primer for Activists, Advocates, and Changemakers of All Kinds

I was just assigned for one of my classes to read this report from my school’s Women of Color Policy Network: Leading at the Intersections: An Introduction to the Intersectional Approach Model for Policy and Social Change.

It’s the kind of document I wish I had come across during my undergrad days, as it is a pretty good introduction to not only the concept of intersectionality and understanding how our experiences are influenced by multiple identities/markers of difference (and the multiple oppressions that come along with them), but also how to begin incorporating that concept into all of your thinking on making change. It’s also a general overview of policy advocacy and movement-building strategy. I recognized a number of strategies that we encourage students to use:

When identifying partners, look for obvious and not so obvious allies and collaborators. Using an intersectional and multi-issue framework, an issue such as violence against women can be framed broadly and include issues related to health care, immigration, and the economy. As such, immigrant rights organizations, labor unions, and health care advocates can also sign on to the campaign.

Using an intersectional framework, it is likely to discover several root causes for an issue or problem. Tackle them by: unpacking and brainstorming the issue and looking at the various communities that may be impacted by it; examining the systems, structures, and institutions involved in maintaining or perpetuating the problem; and considering the ways race, class, gender, ethnicity, or class may be impacting the issue.

Definitely a great intro resource for organizers. Check it out.