Survey of Deaf College Students Indicates High Rates of IPV

After eight years of conducting surveys, researchers at the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) released their findings, indicating that “that deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals are 1.5 times more likely to be victims of relationship violence, including sexual harassment, sexual assault psychological abuse and physical abuse, in their lifetimes.” RIT is home to the National Technical Institute for the Deaf, allowing the researchers to survey thousands of deaf students between 2000 and 20008.

“The results show a significantly higher incidence of domestic violence among deaf and hard-of-hearing students as compared to hearing populations on campus and compared to national averages among college students…[and that] typical assessments of relationship violence may miss differences present in underrepresented and underreported populations such as the deaf,” notes Judy Porter, assistant professor of criminal justice at RIT. “It is our hope these results will lead to further assessment of physical and psychological abuse in the broader deaf community and the development of better tools to assess relationship violence in other underrepresented populations such as the gay and lesbian communities.”

I’ve been looking, but can’t find any more information on the study online, which is unfortunate because I really want to know more about the failures of traditional assessments for the deaf and hard of hard-of-hearing. 9% of the US population is deaf or hard-of-hearing, making it imperative for researchers to develop successful interventions and assessments so that victims of violence can access the resources they need. Admittedly, I know very little about sexual assault in the deaf community, but the DC Rape Crisis Center brings up just two points—of what I am sure is a much longer list—to consider:

  • Deaf women can become isolated within the Deaf community and may fear rejection by that community if she discloses abuse by one of its members.
  • Along with sexual and/or intimate partner violence, Deaf individuals may experience forms of abuse related to their deafness such as injuring a person’s hands so that they cannot communicate, breaking assistive devices such as TTY, vibrating alarms or hearing aids, and forcing a person to use speech.

This reinforces once again the importance SAFER places on creating campus sexual assault policies that reflect the needs/identities/contexts of ALL students.

For more information and resources check out Abused Deaf Women’s Advocacy Services in Washington State, and see Jenny’s post on disability and anti-rape organizing.

Sexual Assault Awareness Month Events in NYC

It’s very close to April, which means time for Sexual Assault Awareness Month. While SSAM events will be going on around the country, I’ll be letting ya’ll know about the ones going on in SAFER’s backyard in NYC. There are sure to be a lot more on the way, but first up:

April 20 has a lot going on, and if you’re in Brooklyn or Manhattan you don’t even have to leave your Borough. In Brooklyn you can attend SAYSO Brooklyn (Sexual Assault Yearly Speak Out), an awareness raising event that also “celebrates healing and recovery.” For info about past NYC SAYSOs, check out the NYC Alliance website.

In Manhattan, Borough President Scott Stringer’s office is hosting a SSAM day of action, with a presentation by Byron Hurt, Beyond Beats and Rhymes filmmaker and a performance by Teatro El Puente.

Brown University Reviewing Sexual Misconduct Policy; Moving In A Good Direction

The Brown University “Standards of Student Conduct” goes up for review every three years, and as part of this year’s review the Office of Student Life is recommending some important changes to the section on sexual misconduct. There’s a lot of things I like about how Brown is going about making these changes (as being reported by the Brown Daily Herald) so I wanted to highlight them here. (This comes a week after I wrote about the cool workshop at Brown about educating students on how to support friends who confide in them about sexual assault. Keep it up, Brown!)

First up, student input!

A committee of faculty, staff, undergraduate students and graduate students reviewed the Standards for Student Conduct, with Philip Gruppuso, associate dean of medicine for medical education, chairing the committee. “There was quite a bit of student input while we were formulating the recommendations,” Klawunn said.

Next up: specific, clear, easily accessible definitions of sexual assault and and associated sanctions. Not to mention actual concern with students being aware and able to understand what constitutes assault and how the disciplinary process work.

The changes to the Sexual Misconduct Policy would create two separate tiers representing two levels of sexual offenses. The first tier, IIIa, consists of sexual misconduct that “involves non-consensual physical contact of a sexual nature.” The second tier, IIIb, consists of sexual misconduct that “includes one or more of the following: penetration, violent physical force or injury.”

The creation of the two tiers in the Sexual Misconduct Policy was spurred by an effort to make the specificity of offenses more clear, Klawunn said. “In some of these cases, as it stands now, (the sexual misconduct code is) very general. Cases would go forward and students would come out with a decision and not know where it falls,” said Yolanda Castillo, associate dean of student life.

Trish Bakaitis-Glover, sexual assault response and prevention program coordinator with Health Services, said the new tiers prevent students from “being in an unknown place” about why a sanction is applied and what evidence is necessary to prove a violation.

Establishing sanctions that are appropriate given the offense and send a message that the school takes sexual assault seriously.

According to proposed new language to the sexual misconduct code, offenses falling under IIIb will “result in more severe sanctions, separation from the University being standard.” “We needed to clear up the language on what the actions would be. The sanctions will be serious,” Klawunn said.

Again, showing that the school takes sexual assault and associated discipline seriously by dedicating resources to the issue including—IMPORTANT!—training the faculty, staff, and students (yes!) who will be hearing cases.

Aside from the creation of the two tiers of sexual misconduct, the report presented to the BUCC also included the possibility of installing an Office of Student Conduct to manage all academic and non-academic offenses…An Office of Student Conduct would “encourage a ‘community standard’ ” and provide deans with “a plan for shared management of cases,” according to the presentation. “We want to have one group of faculty, staff and students who are trained and share some training so that there is one office for student conduct,” Klawunn said.

Paying attention to peer institutions and best practices.

Klawunn said that this distinction mirrors Rhode Island state law. The policies of Brown’s peer schools have more specific levels of misconduct, she said.

And finally, admitting that there’s a problem. So many administrators try to downplay sexual violence on campus, publicly stating that it’s just not a big problem at their school. It’s refreshing to hear university staff openly say that rape is a serious problem on campus, and that they are being proactive about tackling the issue.

Bakaitis-Glover said that, based on statistical information from the U.S. Department of Justice, one in five women experience rape or attempted rape in college and one in 33 men experience rape or attempted rape during their lifetimes. “We don’t have any reasons to believe it will be different on our campus,” she said. Bakaitis-Glover said that many sexual assault cases are not reported and that charges are not filed. “It’s very underreported everywhere, and we figured it must be true here,” Klawunn said.

Affirmative Consent – A Way to Debunk the ‘Miscommunication’ Rape Myth?

These thoughts come as a result of a few different blog posts from this week that I got to read. First was at Yes Means Yes blog – an explanation of how there can be an affirmative consent standard in the legal system.Then I read The Sexist’s recap of a study showing that “Rape Isn’t One Big Misunderstanding” showing that some college men showed that they were well aware of the various ways women (and themselves!) show they won’t consent to sex. And finally, I read the heartbreaking, yet familiar (and triggering) account of a young student raped at Indiana University.

While the Indiana account was very familiar – an outline of a very common scenario of a survivor struggling with the aftermath of rape on campus, the first two posts highlight very different and relatively new conversations surrounding rape. The study referenced in The Sexist’s blog showed that male students, too, would try to use subtle cues (basically do anything but flatout say ‘no’) to tell someone else they did not want to have sex with them. They also admitted to being able to tell when a girl is in a situation where she does not want to have sex and quickly shuts down, but does not say no. Unfortunately, once the moderator brought up issues of sex the male students were quick to say that “no doesn’t always mean no,” but since ‘girls are being girls’ (as much as I wince to say that cliche) they must use clear physical AND verbal cues to show that they don’t want to consent. Even though when THEY don’t want to consent it’s okay for them to not be straightforward.

I’ve noticed that administrators like to use the excuse that it was just “a miscommunication” when a student files a rape complaint against a student…especially one that that particular person has worked with and likes the student in the past. Perhaps now that Thomas wrote that an affirmative consent model could have many benefits (including increasing the rates people are convicted of ‘acquaintance rape,’ which would foster an environment that would make it harder for rapists to thrive) more schools can follow suit. I think it could directly address the amount of times that rape apologists say “well they didn’t say ‘no’” or point to one’s clothing or behavior as an evidence of consent. If it is REQUIRED for both people to say YES – to show their consent – rather than placing the burden of a potential victim to say no by not only saying  no verbally, but by wearing certain clothing, avoiding certain places, and not doing certain things, I think this miscommunication excuse can be diminished.

Clearly we have a long way to go because even when the student in the Indiana University story CLEARLY did not consent (she was sober, too) student commenters still felt like they should blame and shame her for getting raped – apparently screaming and physical resistance and saying “no” is not enough, even though the male students in the study said it would be.

The comments can be triggering for victim blaming, but I like what the most recent comment by musician1 said:

I think that the comments on this story should be deleted. Being a victim of a sexual assault I am deeply offended by the lack of tact and the hostile tone of many of these comments. Let me assure you, sexual assault is never a woman’s fault and this story gave silent voices a chance to be heard. How dare you judge women whom have gone through so much trauma and I am outraged by the deplorable comments on this thread. I ask the editor to please delete this comment and further the previous comments left by misinformed students.

And by this commenter bravely speaking out as a survivor and calling the victim blaming rape apologists “misinformed” I think that this highlights how education is so important. If students are properly educated, I think the environment would be a lot on college campuses for students who want to report rape.

Introducing the INCITE! Community Blog

INCITE! Women of Color Against Violence has recently launched a new community blog that I encourage interested folks to check out. The goals of the blog can be found here, but the general idea is:

The blog features items that promote a progressive or radical agenda for women of color, queer/trans people of color, and gender non-conforming people of color.

We invite you to submit announcements to post on the INCITE! blog! Announcements might include events, statements, videos, images, news articles, press releases, art, job announcements, or calls for submissions for zines, conferences, etc.  Please e-mail your announcement to .

For those not familiar with INCITE!, they are “a national activist organization of radical feminists of color advancing a movement to end violence against women of color and our communities through direct action, critical dialogue and grassroots organizing.” They are also the creators of the Color of Violence Anthology, a must-read for anyone interested in anti-VAW issues and activism. Needless to say, I kind of have a huge organizational crush on them.

Thanks to Jen for the heads up

New Report on Campus Sexual Assault in the UK Recommends Developing Campus Sexual Assault Policies

This week the National Union of Students (NUS) (an organization of 600 student unions in the UK) released “Hidden Marks,” a report on campus sexual assault, the first ever national survey on the subject. I have yet to read the entire report, found in full here, but the key findings reiterate what we know to be true of campus sexual assault here in the US: a shocking number of women report having been seriously assaulted while in college (1 in 7); most have been sexually harassed (68%); the majority of perpetrators were known to the victim and the majority of attacks took place in a residence; rates of reporting are very low; and many assault survivors face serious health and education consequences.

It’s worth noting in particular why students often don’t report (emphasis mine)—according to the survey results, students “felt ashamed or embarrassed; 43 per cent also thought they would be blamed for what had happened, and one in three thought they would not be believed.” As a result, “More than four in ten victims of serious sexual assault have told nobody about what has happened to them.” These sentiments aren’t surprising to hear, especially given public opinion on sexual assault in the UK, but it’s incredibly depressing. I also want to point out though that even when women don’t report to crime to officials, they are likely to “report or discuss what had happened to them with friends or family.” This brings up again the importance of training students on the dynamics of sexual assault and making sure they know how to best support their friends (and themselves) if someone confides in them.

Finally, it’s great to see that the Hidden Marks report focuses its key recommendations on developing institutional policies with the help and input of student unions! Below are their key policy recommendations. Sound familiar?!? I love that they focus on student involvement.

•set out how the institution and students’ union will develop and implement activities to change attitudes and raise awareness of violence;
•enable students and staff to recognise and effectively deal with violence and harassment against women students;
•discuss how to best utilise peer support in tackling violence and harassment;
•contain plans for improving campus design and security so as to help students feel safe;
•outline how the institution will work with relevant agencies to ensure that students access the support services that they need;
•contain steps explaining how reporting will be encouraged;
•set out how the institution will respond to violence against women perpetrated by its students.

(h/t AAWU and Holly Kearl’s twitter feeds)

Why Words Matter: Victim-Blaming and Gender Inequality

When I reflect on the various statements and ideas that, repeated throughout my adolescence in one way or another, really impacted who I became today, it’s sad but true that I mostly remember the negative ones. Not because I had grew up surrounded by unsupportive family, friends, educators, etc….in fact I have no idea why. But something about the stuff that hurts makes it stick, and forms you, perhaps not more but just more consciously, than the good stuff. I was reminded of this power that seemingly benign words and messages can have this morning when I hopped online.

The first story that caught my eye was this new report from the AAUW on the under-representation of women in math and science. This issue has a long, controversial “nature vs. nurture” history about whether women are biologically predisposed to being worse at math and science or if they simply face a ton of gender bias in those fields. The AAUW report doesn’t solve the debate, but it does include many examples of bias. More importantly, it finds that women are unlikely to succeed in math and science if they’re simply told they won’t:

The university women’s report cited research showing that girls’ performance suffers from any suggestion that they do poorly at math. In one experiment, college students with strong math backgrounds and similar abilities were divided into two groups and tested on math. One group was told that men perform better on the test, the other that there was no difference in performance between the sexes. Their results were starkly different: in the group told that men do better, men indeed did much better, with an average score of 25 compared with the women’s 5. In the group told there was no difference, women scored 17 and men 19.

These results are really striking. But after thinking about it for a few minutes I realized I shouldn’t be all that surprised, since the very same premise holds true for what I write about here all the time (albeit in a different way).

Today a friend was telling me about a particularly shitty and extreme street harassment experience she had recently. And she admitted that even though she knew in her heart what happened to her wasn’t her fault, she couldn’t help but stop to question the way she was dressed; wonder if maybe it wouldn’t have happened if she just wasn’t wearing a short skirt…the same self-blaming, shameful feeling that women are consistently taught to feel by a society that consistently blames them for what happens to them instead of the folks responsible for harassing and assaulting them.

No where is this victim-blaming more clear then in comments sections on the internet. I rarely read comments sections, as I know by now what to expect and would rather save myself the grief. But this piece in the Missourian, coupled with the AAUW report and my friend’s story, reminded me why what a bunch of anonymous creeps on the internet actually matter. Writer Roseann Moring reflects on the comments posted to a Columbia Daily Tribune article about two the rapes of two young women, which range from blaming the women for their drinking (even though it’s likely that one of them was drugged), to imploring them to use more “common sense,” to straight-up saying that one of them “wanted it.” All of these commenters were anonymous. Moring reminds her readers of what anti-violence advocates discuss all the time, but can always use repeating:

So when victims hear from their friends or from their community, that they must have been at fault, some start to believe it. Then they don’t go to police, or they don’t want to follow through with prosecution, a process that is difficult in the best of times.

What that means to me, or to you, or to your sister or mother or friend, is that an overwhelming number of rapists go free, knowing there are no consequences for their actions. Or, worse, they don’t learn that what they’ve done makes them a rapist.

…You might be anonymous, but your words still have an effect — and not just on people struggling to recover from a sexual assault. The words keep alive the central myth about rape: that victims ask for it and that assailants can’t be expected to tell a “no” from a “yes.”

So I may write off anonymous internet commenters are jerks in the ether because I just don’t want to have to think about them or give them credit, but they ARE undoubtedly part of the problem. They add to the malicious chatter that, over time, makes women second-guess themselves, discourages reporting, and allows the cycle of violence to continue. Just as if you hear over and over again that girls don’t do as well as boys in math, you might psych yourself into doing poorly and become an English major, if you hear over and over again that you deserve whatever happens to you once you take a drink or wear a short dress, you might convince yourself “it” wasn’t “rape” and never deal with/report the assault. We have to collectively recognize that what we say matters—that we don’t speak into a vaccuum, but to and about real people, and as part of larger important cultural dialogues that shape who we become.

College Students: Speak Up About Gender Equality

I’ve written before about Men Speak Up!, a media-based project out of Harvard that is encouraging men speak out about gender inequality and the role of men in fighting violence against women. Well, this week they’re asking men and women to add their voices to the discussion. See their call for video and written contributions below and get involved!

Women and men from any college or university, are encouraged to apply to offer video contributions, and/or written statements, in favor of a progressive understanding of gender equality. You may also nominate someone whom you think would make a great contribution. This year’s video filming is scheduled for Friday and Saturday 26-27 March 2010, from 10:00am to 4:00pm each day, in Cambridge, MA. Students interested in contributing a video statement to the project should fill out the statement of interest form here.

Important Resource for DV Survivors: Address Confidentiality Programs

This is a little outside of SAFER’s scope, but a fellow anti-violence activist recently sent me some info on the issue and it seemed important to share. It’s census time, which can bring up a lot of discomfort for folks who are trying to keep their locations hidden from former abusive partners. Although the census bureau assures that all information gathered in the census is kept private, that may not feel like enough if you’ve moved your whole life away from the trauma of an abusive relationship.

This also comes up around registering to vote, which actually IS public information in many states. In response, the National Network to End Domestic Violence started a program called VotePower, a “ground-breaking initiative aimed at increasing battered women’s participation in the voting process.”

By working with state domestic violence coalitions, local domestic violence programs and other allies, NNEDV has implemented voter mobilization campaigns addressing voter confidentiality, voter registration, voter contact and safe GOTV efforts for battered women.  Empowering battered women through the voting process represents a major success in efforts to increase civic participation among marginalized groups.

VotePower reaches out to women, encouraging them to “assess their safety and confidentiality needs” and consider Address Confidentiality Programs. About 30 states currently have Address Confidentiality Programs, and though guidelines, eligibility, and funding differ from state-to-state, they generally operate by providing DV/stalking survivors with a substitute addresses for all public records so that their real addresses can remain confidential.

ACPs, which began in Washington in 1991, reduce the risk that offenders can use public information to gain access to their victims.  Offenders often use public data, such voter or drivers’ license registries, to find a victim’s address. Yet victims can’t falsify their addresses on public documents-even to protect themselves-without facing criminal penalties.  ACP laws bridge this gap by allowing victims to use the alternate ACP address when submitting information to public agencies.

For more on ACPs, please see the the info at the National Center for Victims of Crime’s Stalking Resource Center (where the above quote was taken from). The NCVC also has a list of state ACP programs with contact info. They list 32 states, which the VotePower folks have a list of 28—I’m not sure what is most accurate. I’m sad to see that New York isn’t on either list and intend to do some research to see if it has ever even been on the table. The friend who gave me the heads up about ACPs in light of the 2010 census was hoping to spread the word and prompt people to become advocates for lobbying for these programs in their states, and to make sure their friends and colleagues know about the resource. So now that you’ve read this, please take a few moments to check out what your state is or isn’t doing to protect DV and stalking survivors. ALSO: keep in mind that being a good ally means respecting people’s privacy—you may think you know your neighbor’s past, but you may not. If a census worker in knocking next door because your neighbor hasn’t handed in her form, and s/he stops to ask you some seemingly really harmless questions about the folks who live there, remember that it’s their right to choose not to participate and—just in case—maybe the best option is to consider that they really might not want you answering.

Abusers think ‘Everyone is Doing It’

Sarah pointed me to a disturbing article titled ‘Men who Batter think other guys do it, too,’ which highlights a study done at the University of Washington. The study resulted in men who abused their partners tended to overestimate how many other men do it, too. The more physically severe their abuse is, the MORE they overestimate how prevalent abuse is.

This is groundbreaking because this is the first study that shows that intimate partner violence overestimation is relevent to other behaviors such as drug abuse and gambling. In short, why does this mean?

“Social norms theory suggests that people act in a way that they believe is consistent with what the average person does,” adds Denise Walker, research professor of social work and co-director of the Innovative Programs Research Group.

So how is this relevant to SAFER’s beliefs about Better Sexual Assault Policies on campuses? Well it is all about prevention, prevention, prevention. Schools need to go above and beyond an optional skit for freshman the second day of orientation. If we educate students not only about what abuse is, but also that it is not the norm, then we can fight the notion that many abusers have that everyone is doing it. A professor at UWash agrees,

“With sexual assault the more a man thought it was prevalent the more likely he was to engage in such behavior. If we can correct misperceptions about the prevalence of intimate partner violence, we have a chance to change men’s behavior. If you give them factual information it is harder for them to justify their behavior,” Neighbors says.

So this means that not only schools (society as a whole) need to bring more attention to educating everyone about domestic and sexual violence. That education then turns into prevention and creating a better, safer community for everyone.

For more info on the study, check out some info here and here. The full study will be released in the Violence Against Women journal.