Yesterday I almost bought a candy bar, but I stopped when I saw that the ingredients included palm oil. Palm oil is one of the major exports Colombian people are being forced off their land to make room for. Multinational corporations make a lot of money from palm oil, apparently. Enough that they buy weapons for groups that do stuff like line people up and cut their heads off with chainsaws. See, Colombian paramilitary groups run people off the land with terrorism, and then the multinationals can have space to grow their palm oil.
I picked up another candy bar. It was made by Nestle, so I put it down. The union representative I met in Colombia told me that Nestle killed some of his friends.
I decided that candy bars aren’t good for me anyway, though I knew that whatever my next meal was, it would probably leave blood on my hands.
I consider myself an anti-violence activist, and someone committed to peace, but my trip to Colombia has me wondering how much I actually live those ideals. It’s one thing to “know,” intellectually, that when you buy Chiquita bananas or Kraft foods of Coca-Cola, your purchase supports “bad stuff.” It’s another to sit next to a woman sobbing over the death of her husband, knowing that you helped finance the weapon that killed him.
I feel fairly certain that she wouldn’t have had much interest in how hard it is for me to find socially responsible products, how I would have had to be really inconvenienced to do so, and how I really mean well.
If I oppose sexual violence, how can I buy products that force women into refugee communities where they are raped without consequence? What would it mean for me to actually be in solidarity with those women? What does it really mean to oppose violence, from our position of privilege? What would we have to give up?
I don’t have any answers, but the questions are not comfortable.